The long way towards resilience - Part 10
Do we always need to go the full nine yards?

In the previous post, we discussed what we find at the peak of Mt. Resilience, the peak of advanced resilience (anti-fragility).
Do we always need to go the full nine yards?
In the previous post, we discussed what we find at the peak of Mt. Resilience, the peak of advanced resilience (anti-fragility).
The peak of advanced resilience (anti-fragility)
In the previous post, we broadened our view and learned about the sameness of business and IT. We also used the four response types of resilience to change our static approach regarding threats towards a more dynamic one, including continuous evaluation of threats, learning and repositioning in an ever-changing threat landscape. This adds the last missing shard to resilience: Anti-fragility.
Responding to changing threat landscapes
In the previous post, we discussed what we find at the high-plateau of basic resilience.
The high-plateau of basic resilience
In the previous post, we discussed what it means to also prepare for surprises, the realizations needed to guide us to the next plateau, including the probably biggest obstacle in our way: efficiency obsession.
Surprises and antagonists
In the previous post, we discussed the plateau of robustness, the second interim stop on the journey towards resilience, what it is good for, what its limitations are and what it means to get there.