In the previous post, we discussed (decision) uncertainty as a key factor that determines how well a given approach works regarding the When and How much of architectural work.

I recently did a presentation at Compass AI & Tech Summit in Budapest. The title of my presentation was “The 7 pitfalls of AI”. The presentation was about some still unresolved, yet often neglected issues regarding AI. We still need to find good answers for these issues if we want to arrive where we want to be at the end of our AI transition (if there is an end at all). If we fail to find good answers, we risk ending up in a place where we do not want to be, not being able to…

The previous post concluded the discussion of the What, the essential activities of architectural work using the 4E framework as guidance.

In the previous post, we introduced the idea of the 4E framework and discussed the first two of the “E”. In this post, we will discuss the remaining two “E” and complete the ideas of the framework.

In the previous post, we concluded the discussion of the Why, the purpose of architectural work, by looking at the cognitive and the humane facets of architectural work. We also briefly discussed that AI agents are not able to satisfy these traits of architectural work unless you solve solved problems time and again.